Enoch Powell: Failure

Atheism
Politics
Memes
Mind
Matters
Random
Interact
Feedback
Email
Links
Forum
Home


Conspiracy Theories
War: What is it Good For?
Americans are...
For the Love of America
England and the Islamic Threat
Guns
Martin Willett on
Islamic Threat
Islam and Women
Respectful Silence
Paedophilia is not a crime
Beheading in Islam
Does God Bless America?
Death to Monarchies
The Defence of Liberty
The Right to Bare Arms
It's Our Money!
9/11 Inside Job?
One World
Is Prince Charles Gay?
Billionaires and Capitalists
Free Pornography
Why Bolsheviks don't want to kill Billionaires
Are atheists communists?
Fitna, Geert Wilders and the Death of European Freedom
Give Peace a Chance
Libertarians and Fascists
Are the races equally intelligent?
Religion's Dirtiest Tricks
The Great Race Taboo

Enoch Powell: smarm personified


“All political lives, unless they are cut off in midstream at a happy juncture, end in failure, because that is the nature of politics and of human affairs.”

John Enoch Powell, 1912 - 1998

Enoch Powell was, in my opinion, clearly the smartest and ablest politician in his generation, certainly one of the top ten parliamentarians in the twentieth century, possibly even in the top five. He was also a stunning failure on a scale which is every bit as big as his success, his appeal and his intellect.

Of Enoch Powell, Michael Foot (probably also one of the top ten parliamentarians, and failures) said: “The Tory Kingdom would sooner or later have been his to command, for he had all the shining qualities which the others lacked. Heath would never had outmanoeuvred him; Thatcher would never have stepped into the vacant shoes. It was a tragedy for Enoch, and a tragedy for the rest of us too.”

The tragedy can be summed up in three words rivers of blood. One speech, given in 1968, which saw his dismissal from the Conservative party's shadow cabinet by Edward Heath. It ended his chance of becoming Prime Minister. It also ensured that Britain developed the problems which we are seeing today. The tragedy was in allowing racists, or racialists as they were known then, to support his calls for curbs on immigration. He played the race card and ensured that he would never again be seen as a potential Prime Minister, he also ensured that the cause he believed in would be tarred with the foul taint of racism and bigotry for decades to come. Because of Enoch Powell and the stink he caused back in 1968 nobody has had the courage to talk about this subject openly and so he has ensured that he will be remembered as the prophet of doom that came to pass rather than the saviour of the nation he loved.

What's the difference between a racist and a racialist? One young Tory told me that Tories preferred to use the word racialist as an insult because it sounds like socialist, whereas those on the left prefer racist because it sounds like fascist. Regardless, the term racialist is now seen as being old fashioned. If only racism was old fashioned.

Powell's speech in 1968 warned of the dangers of immigration and how the dependents of immigrants who were at that time coming into the country would be the fuel for an increasing population of people from immigrant stock in the future.

We must be mad, literally mad, as a nation to be permitting the annual inflow of some 50,000 dependents, who are for the most part the material of the future growth of the immigrant-descended population. It is like watching a nation busily engaged in heaping up its own funeral pyre.

Watch this speech (inside this excellent BBC documentary)

you cannot fail to be impressed with his oratory even if you detest what he is saying. The way his voice shifts up an octave when he says literally mad is classic oratory at its finest. Hitler himself could not have done better, and I mean that without any irony.

His great mistake was not to repudiate or at least deprecate racist sentiments as he was doing it. He made no apparent effort to distance himself from the overtly racist sentiments that had been communicated to him as a constituency MP for Wolverhampton, a town which had a rapidly growing population of West Indian immigrants. Many people have erroneously believed that Enoch Powell himself was warning that “In this country in fifteen or twenty years' time the black man will have the whip hand over the white man.” These were not Powell's own words but his great mistake was in not making this clear and in not condemning these attitudes and prejudices. He was absolutely right, there was a very real problem, immigrants were making the indigenous community hostile, they were straining their tolerance to and beyond breaking point. The immigrants were not the problem, the problem was, and is, the way people who feel under pressure from in-comers respond by bringing out the worst aspects of human nature. The tragedy of rapid immigration and population growth within groups seen to be different is the way good people are turned bad. I think Yoda had it right. Fear leads to hatred which leads to the dark side (of human nature).

The rivers of blood that Powell was predicting were to be caused by tensions which escalate into racial hatred and intolerance and culminating in race riots and perhaps if not checked even ethnic cleansing. He did not make any reference at all to Islam, those who say, in ignorance, “Enoch was right!” and suggest that he was anticipating the events of 7/7 are way off the mark. Enoch Powell's vision of a nightmare future for Britain was a mirror of American race riots of the 1960s and before.

Atheism
Politics
Memes
Mind
Matters
Random
Interact
Feedback
Email
Links
Forum
Home



Was Enoch Powell Racist?

When asked by David Frost was he a racialist this is what he said:

It depends on how you define the word “racialist.” If you mean being conscious of the differences between men and nations, and from that, races, then we are all racialists. However, if you mean a man who despises a human being because he belongs to another race, or a man who believes that one race is inherently superior to another, then the answer is emphatically “No.”

It is not enough not to be a racist you must also make very clear that you do not welcome racists supporting or following you. By not declaring his unease or concern about the openly hostile, racist and nasty attitudes of many who supported him he sealed his fate. Why was it so hard for him to say that racism and racial hatred were wrong? Or that intolerance was a nasty vice and not a noble sentiment? That would have been enough. He might not have escaped his sacking but he could have stayed in the Conservative party, he could have remained within the pale, and he would have stood an excellent chance of being its next leader instead of Margaret Thatcher.

It is a perfectly reasonable position to take to wish to limit immigration to levels which will not be problematic and will not be likely to cause or exacerbate tensions that already exist in a society. It is also perfectly reasonable to declare that immigration has already exceeded prudent levels. Such a position does not require anybody to be racist or to condone racism it merely requires people to acknowledge that racial tension is something which is best avoided and it has been known to exist in British society. This is not scaremongering it is prudent statesmanship. This indeed is the belief of many black and Asian people already in Britain, enough is enough, if these levels are exceeded it will be difficult to prevent racist sentiments spreading out from the hardcore of dyed-in-the-wool racists to infect the wider community. Nobody benefits from heightened racial tension, with the possible exception of emergency glaziers.

If Enoch Powell had declared his revulsion towards racism and intolerance rather than seeming to suggest it was just one of those things, hey ho, he could well have become the greatest Prime Minister Britain ever had. Instead he allowed himself to be portrayed as a racist and a bigot and he became the enemy of everybody who deplored racism, which included a significant proportion of the establishment, media and political classes of Britain.

I believe his own words, I do not think that Enoch Powell hated black people or saw them as inferior in any way. But he pandered to racists and did nothing to suggest that he felt disgust at their attitudes and neither did he make any attempt to distance himself from their bigotry. Probably his capacity to stomach bigotry and bigots played a large part in his subsequent adoption by the Ulster Unionists. His presence on the Ulster Unionist benches didn't do a great deal to preserve the union or the official Ulster Unionist party but it did give Britain a chance to see his enormous intellect and genuine passion on display on the greatest platform for political activity known to man, the floor of the House of Commons.



Exchanges prompted by a YouTube video about Enoch Powell, who has been adopted by the BNP in the way Mormons baptize the dead.

he talked so much sense and look what happened to him.

goldyn12345

Yes, he let people like you /gestures vaguely/ support him and kissed goodbye to any chance to change anything. Racism is the kiss of death to practical politics. You give in to racial hatred and you're out in the wilderness for ever.
As the BNP is racist in its founding documents and constitution no other party will ever share power with you. Ever. You're wasting your time. Racism is a dead end.

MartinJWillett

 

We need immigrants who will integrate, immigrants who want to be a part of this country not just a part of this economy.
Race is irrelevant. What matters is culture and culture need not be determined by ancestry. I have no problem with most immigrants who have come here but there are some who want to change this country to suit themselves rather than finding a niche within our society. To point this out you don't have to be racist or intolerant or illiberal. You just have to be honest.

MartinJWillett

 

Black isn't British. This country is over-populated. Send 'em back!

tommytoxen

Bollocks. This country is not over-populated. The problem is that the indigenous community has a birth rate which is too low and a disturbingly high propensity to bugger off to live somewhere warmer (and less Muslim) at the first opportunity they get.

Talk of sending them back or fighting them off is not doing much to address this crisis of confidence in our own culture, values and communities. We need to ensure that we don't surrender our land to those who do have the desire to populate it.

MartinJWillett

We have a low birth rate because our women have the choice not only when to have children but not to have them at all.A lower birth rate is what the planet needs.Our island is over crowded and now multi national not multi cultural.Every greens space,every plant and animal will be dislodged FOREVER to house ungrateful immigrant vermin.We have to fight and we have to fight now and I dont mean just voting BNP.

CHUNNELBOMBER

No of course you don't just mean voting BNP, you mean killing people you don't like. I get that. I really do get that. It isn't necessary to sugar-coat it for me, I understand that BNP supporters are vicious psychotic bastards who are relishing the chance to kill people they hate. At least many of them are. It's not a membership requirement as such, you just have to be white, pay your subs and be stupid enough to want to join. But who ever gets kicked out for being a violent racist bigot?

MartinJWillett

You could not be further from the truth.I am not a BNP member.I have never met a BNP member yet who advocates use of extreme violence.Unlike the ANC and Mandela who you no doubt regaurd as a hero.Did anyone criticise Ken Livingstone for supporting terrorism?George Galloway?I bet you think Gerry Adams and McGuiness are great?This is ethnic cleansing of the native working class.What should we do?The Nazi's loved your sort in 1939.Have you got a bedsheet for your window ready?

CHUNNELBOMBER

Did anybody criticize Ken Livingstone and George Galloway for supporting terrorism? Errr. Yes. We certainly did. Why on Earth would I support Adams or McGuinness? I'm English, not Irish and I'm not some crazy lefty that thinks my country is by definition in the wrong. Whether you are a paid up member of the BNP or not I don't care, keep your money, the BNP is clearly your obsession, your trail is hardly hidden or pretty. I don't think the Nazis did like antifascists much somehow.

MartinJWillett

More than one person uses this name.The BNP is no obsession.The safety of myself my family and my nation is.The Nazi's like the far left and Islam like people who wont fight.You are not a man.You dont have to stand tall but you do have to stand to be a man.What are you going to do white boy rely on white working class kids to protect you?You are not an anti facist you are a collaborator.

CHUNNELBOMBER

Don't lecture me about being a man from behind a mask.

MartinJWillett

MartinJwillet.Look you fat traitorous cunt.The last thing this nation needs is faggots like you without a backbone.Now fuck off and chatter while men do your dirty work for you!Thank fuck our fathers where not like you or we would all be Nazi's now.Stick you head up your arse and watch Big Brother!

CHUNNELBOMBER

People can see my face, hear my voice and read my name. I don't talk big and hard behind a mask of anonymity.
To support the kids who used to try to beat me up as a child would be the real treason. No Muslim has ever attacked me for being who I am and trying to be better but people like you have: white, working class, intolerant, envious, lacking in aspiration and vicious with it. Any dirty "work" you do you do for your own nasty reasons, not for me or for my causes.

MartinJWillett

By personal message:

You are inciting hatred by writing anti BNP comments

You are inciting hatred by writing anti BNP comments
Spamming BNP videos with rediculous unfounded arguments.Your personal opinion is not Fact.

Any further anti-BNP comments from you on my videos will be deleted. You are welcome to post positive comments about the BNP

It is you who is the uneducated one, by the way, not us.

Griffinite10,

BNP supporter and member of the BNP youtube community.

 

Sorry, wrong person, Ignore that last message

Sorry, wrong person, Ignore that last message
It was intended at someone spreading malicious lies.Sent it to wrong person.

My apoligies

Griffinite10

 

Re: Sorry, wrong person, Ignore that last message

Anonymous masked one,

I'm offended. I have not been spreading malicious lies about the BNP I have been saying the BNP is a party full of racist bigots who will never win more than a handful of seats at an election and would never be asked to be part of any coalition by any other party and therefore it is a complete waste of time to vote for them. I wasn't aware that there was such a thing as a malicious truth. Truth simply is. That is my opinion and therefore is true, as a representation of my opinion. What else can I offer? I am not a god.

When I say the BNP is full of racist bigots I mean that in the way that Millwall's New Den might be said to be full of white working class men, not suggesting that the BNP was full or that everybody within it was a racist bigot just that if that was the kind of person you wanted to find you could do a lot worse than look right there. That's my opinion and I am entitled to it, this is a free country, more or less.

No apoligy [sic] required.

Your claim that I was the uneducated one and not you would have been significantly less amusing if you knew how to spell ridiculous.

http://wsu.edu/~brians/errors/rediculous.html

Re: Sorry, wrong person, Ignore that last message

To call all BNP supporters uneducated Thugs is an insult.

The original message was intended at someone else, not you.

However after that shower of hate against the BNP, the same rule applys to you; you are no longer welcome to comment on my videos and any anti BNP comments /opinion WILL be deleted.

Your comments incite anger and racial hatred, as well as spreading anti BNP lies.Such comments are not welcome, or civilised. You will find that you will get the same response across the BNP community as your sweeping anti white , predominantly anti BNP views are not welcome nor accepted.

Your opinion isn't fact. Infact, your opinion is wrong.

Fact is, the BNP is on the rise.

Griffinite10

Can you show me where I said all BNP supporters were thugs? By the way unless you are actually a devotee of the Thuggee cult the word thug does not merit a capital letter.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thuggee

Perhaps a course in logic would be useful to you, or critical thinking, or indeed English. I am sure you will be able to find some courses if you look hard. (You do at least look hard I take it, I guess I'll just have to imagine you looking hard) I have never made any sweeping judgements about all BNP members. None at all. Feel free to prove me wrong.

I would also be obliged if you could indicate the shower of hate, or even the odd isolated raindrop of hate aimed at the BNP. Disdain, scorn and derision perhaps, but hate? No. You're not worth hate. Hate leads to suffering. I'm sure some wrinkly coloured dude said that. Gandhi or Yoda, some kind of alien anyway.

In what way has anything I have written, said or done been in any way "anti white"? The interests of white people and the BNP are not in the least bit identical. You don't get to tell me what is or is not pro or anti white or to define the interests of the whites. You are not in any sense a community leader still less a race leader.

As I explained in my last message my opinions are factually and truthfully my opinions. I do not have the authority to declare opinions to be facts. Neither do you.

If you have an imagination I ask you to try to imagine just how gutted and ashamed I am to be banned by the BNP. It's been the highlight of my day.

Toodle pip

Martin J Willett

Atheism | Politics | Memes | Mind | Matters | Interact | Feedback | Email | Links | Search | Forum | Home
© 1999 - 2010 by Martin Willett.
mwillett.org: Debate Unlimited