AtheismPoliticsMemesMindMattersRandomInteractFeedbackLinksForumHomeConspiracy TheoriesWar: What is it Good For?Americans are...For the Love of AmericaEngland and the Islamic ThreatGunsMartin Willett on
|
Enoch Powell: smarm personified
John Enoch Powell, 1912 - 1998Enoch Powell was, in my opinion, clearly the smartest and ablest politician in his generation, certainly one of the top ten parliamentarians in the twentieth century, possibly even in the top five. He was also a stunning failure on a scale which is every bit as big as his success, his appeal and his intellect. Of Enoch Powell, Michael Foot (probably also one of the top ten parliamentarians, and failures) said: “The Tory Kingdom would sooner or later have been his to command, for he had all the shining qualities which the others lacked. Heath would never had outmanoeuvred him; Thatcher would never have stepped into the vacant shoes. It was a tragedy for Enoch, and a tragedy for the rest of us too.” The tragedy can be summed up in three words rivers of blood. One speech, given in 1968, which saw his dismissal from the Conservative party's shadow cabinet by Edward Heath. It ended his chance of becoming Prime Minister. It also ensured that Britain developed the problems which we are seeing today. The tragedy was in allowing racists, or racialists as they were known then, to support his calls for curbs on immigration. He played the race card and ensured that he would never again be seen as a potential Prime Minister, he also ensured that the cause he believed in would be tarred with the foul taint of racism and bigotry for decades to come. Because of Enoch Powell and the stink he caused back in 1968 nobody has had the courage to talk about this subject openly and so he has ensured that he will be remembered as the prophet of doom that came to pass rather than the saviour of the nation he loved. What's the difference between a racist and a racialist? One young Tory told me that Tories preferred to use the word racialist as an insult because it sounds like socialist, whereas those on the left prefer racist because it sounds like fascist. Regardless, the term racialist is now seen as being old fashioned. If only racism was old fashioned. Powell's speech in 1968 warned of the dangers of immigration and how the dependents of immigrants who were at that time coming into the country would be the fuel for an increasing population of people from immigrant stock in the future.
Watch this speech (inside this excellent BBC documentary) you cannot fail to be impressed with his oratory even if you detest what he is saying. The way his voice shifts up an octave when he says literally mad is classic oratory at its finest. Hitler himself could not have done better, and I mean that without any irony. His great mistake was not to repudiate or at least deprecate racist sentiments as he was doing it. He made no apparent effort to distance himself from the overtly racist sentiments that had been communicated to him as a constituency MP for Wolverhampton, a town which had a rapidly growing population of West Indian immigrants. Many people have erroneously believed that Enoch Powell himself was warning that “In this country in fifteen or twenty years' time the black man will have the whip hand over the white man.” These were not Powell's own words but his great mistake was in not making this clear and in not condemning these attitudes and prejudices. He was absolutely right, there was a very real problem, immigrants were making the indigenous community hostile, they were straining their tolerance to and beyond breaking point. The immigrants were not the problem, the problem was, and is, the way people who feel under pressure from in-comers respond by bringing out the worst aspects of human nature. The tragedy of rapid immigration and population growth within groups seen to be different is the way good people are turned bad. I think Yoda had it right. Fear leads to hatred which leads to the dark side (of human nature). The rivers of blood that Powell was predicting were to be caused by tensions which escalate into racial hatred and intolerance and culminating in race riots and perhaps if not checked even ethnic cleansing. He did not make any reference at all to Islam, those who say, in ignorance, “Enoch was right!” and suggest that he was anticipating the events of 7/7 are way off the mark. Enoch Powell's vision of a nightmare future for Britain was a mirror of American race riots of the 1960s and before. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
AtheismPoliticsMemesMindMattersRandomInteractFeedbackLinksForumHome |
Was Enoch Powell Racist?When asked by David Frost was he a racialist this is what he said:
It is not enough not to be a racist you must also make very clear that you do not welcome racists supporting or following you. By not declaring his unease or concern about the openly hostile, racist and nasty attitudes of many who supported him he sealed his fate. Why was it so hard for him to say that racism and racial hatred were wrong? Or that intolerance was a nasty vice and not a noble sentiment? That would have been enough. He might not have escaped his sacking but he could have stayed in the Conservative party, he could have remained within the pale, and he would have stood an excellent chance of being its next leader instead of Margaret Thatcher. It is a perfectly reasonable position to take to wish to limit immigration to levels which will not be problematic and will not be likely to cause or exacerbate tensions that already exist in a society. It is also perfectly reasonable to declare that immigration has already exceeded prudent levels. Such a position does not require anybody to be racist or to condone racism it merely requires people to acknowledge that racial tension is something which is best avoided and it has been known to exist in British society. This is not scaremongering it is prudent statesmanship. This indeed is the belief of many black and Asian people already in Britain, enough is enough, if these levels are exceeded it will be difficult to prevent racist sentiments spreading out from the hardcore of dyed-in-the-wool racists to infect the wider community. Nobody benefits from heightened racial tension, with the possible exception of emergency glaziers. If Enoch Powell had declared his revulsion towards racism and intolerance rather than seeming to suggest it was just one of those things, hey ho, he could well have become the greatest Prime Minister Britain ever had. Instead he allowed himself to be portrayed as a racist and a bigot and he became the enemy of everybody who deplored racism, which included a significant proportion of the establishment, media and political classes of Britain. I believe his own words, I do not think that Enoch Powell hated black people or saw them as inferior in any way. But he pandered to racists and did nothing to suggest that he felt disgust at their attitudes and neither did he make any attempt to distance himself from their bigotry. Probably his capacity to stomach bigotry and bigots played a large part in his subsequent adoption by the Ulster Unionists. His presence on the Ulster Unionist benches didn't do a great deal to preserve the union or the official Ulster Unionist party but it did give Britain a chance to see his enormous intellect and genuine passion on display on the greatest platform for political activity known to man, the floor of the House of Commons. Exchanges prompted by a YouTube video about Enoch Powell, who has been adopted by the BNP in the way Mormons baptize the dead.
|
© 1999 - 2010 by Martin Willett. |
mwillett.org: Debate Unlimited |