|
Right now America is considered a free country and possibly
the greatest country on Earth. Ever count how many laws are on
the books?
If all of mankind Kept God's laws.. only 10 simple rules written
in stone. Mankind would be truly free. Six out of the Ten laws
established by God are already in Man's laws in their many forms
and you are essentially required to keep them. Problem with men
who do not love God is that you can make a million more laws
to go with the million you already have and it will not make a
difference since they serve only themself and keep no law.
Men of God don't need man's Many laws since they are already
addressed in the Holy 10 Commands established by God.
So tell me with the many laws you either keep or break in America,
Are you truly free? I am. |
Let’s start by taking a look at all the prophecies concerning
the birth of the Christ since Christ said he fulfilled "ALL" in
the law and the prophets concerning him.
<huge spammy multicoloured email prattling on about prophesies snipped
unread> |
No. Let's not. You can, I won't.
 |
It is Sad that you would make a decision on only half the information.
You say there is no God but your whole life you have only been
shown bits and peices of half truth. When Solid proof comes your
way you have no patience for it. Why are you on a debate site if
your not going to cover the real material and then debate?
Remember good old benny. Passover of 2009 at the full moon.....
A day is coming that all men will know there is a God. Unfortunately
the majority will go after the one who looses. By not choosing
to follow God you have already lost because Satan wins you by
defult.
Take care and God Bless
Todd |
The above message was sent 9th February 2009. By this time
I was thoroughly bored with Todd and all I wanted to do was wait
until his prophesy failed.
Which of course it did. |
I have no intention of providing you with a platform for promoting
your views. You are free to come to me to debate my views. If I
wanted your views I would go out and find you. You found me. My
site is for me to promote and debate my views and sometimes to
debate the views of other people that I am interested in. Your
views on the Roman interpretation of Hebrew words in your sorry
bit of stolen Hebrew mythology is not of interest to me. Go and
find somewhere to debate it with people who care. You could try
the Debate Unlimited Forum, somebody might bite.
My site is called Debate Unlimited, that is a title not a claim
about a product. I'm not selling anything, I'm giving it away.
I do not promise to debate anything with anybody for as long as
they want to. I am not crazy. I debate what I am interested in
with people who are worthy. When I get bored I stop.
--
Martin Willett
http://mwillett.org/
|
The views I present are the debate to your views. You
invite debate by stating God is not real. The information
sent to you proves otherwise and clears the confusion within
the multi denominations which claim to serve Christ.
I am more like you than you know. Up
to a year and a half ago, I too did not belive in God. After conducting the study
presented to you, I have no choice but to say he is real
and the evidence is in the study. I am a mechanical/logical
thinker relying on Math and time to define my understanding
of the world around me. All the same problems you see with
current christianity today i see as well. The stories told
by the Christian perception just do not add up to reality.
This is why i stepped outside the traditional christian box
to see if there was anything to the God concept through prophecy.
It is claimed by Christ that prophecy is the witness given
to him from the Father God.
You will notice by the study that I step outside of the
bible box to take a look at history vs prophecy to see if
there is any credibility to the fulfillment of the prophecies
and if any first or second century written testimonies can
confirm what I have found. Turns out there is a great deal
of information supporting what is presented in the study.
Traditional christians reject the information being found
due to traditional beliefs that they can never be wrong in
their understanding or in their belief that the bible is
perfect. You will see that I do not share this view.
It's totally up to you if you take the time to review the
information. I can assure you that it's an outlook of perception
you will not get from a traditional Christian. I would actually
value a credible feedback/debate from you, if you could offer
the time to review in more detail what is presented.
Let the debate begin
Todd M. Vetter |
April 30th 2009, no evidence of Benny looking unwell. Any comments,
loser?
--
Martin Willett
http://mwillett.org/
A powerful comment actually
Do you have the courage to read this in full?
John 7:42
Has not the Scripture said that the Christ comes from the seed
of David and from the town of Bethlehem, where David was?”
Acts 2:29-30
29 Men and brethren, let me freely speak unto you of the patriarch
David, that he is both dead and buried, and his sepulcher is with
us unto this day.
30 Therefore being a prophet, and knowing that God had sworn
with an oath to him, that of the fruit of his loins, according
to the flesh, he would raise up Christ to sit on his throne;
Romans 1:3
concerning his Son Jesus Christ our Lord, which was made of the
seed of David according to the flesh;
http://reluctant-messenger.com/essene/gospel_1.htm
AND in the sixth month the angel Gabriel was sent from God, unto
a city of Galilee, named Nazareth, to a virgin espoused to a man
whose name was Joseph, of the house of David; and the virgin's
name was Mary.2. Now Joseph was a just and rational Mind, and he
was skilled in all manner of work in wood and in stone. And Mary
was a tender and discerning Soul, and she wrought veils for the
temple. And they were both pure before God; and of them both was
Jesu-Maria who is called the Christ. 3. And the angel came in unto
her and said, Hail, Mary, thou that art highly favored, for the
Mother of God is with thee: blessed art thou among women and blessed
be the fruit of thy womb. 4. And when she saw him, she was troubled
at his saying, and cast in her mind what manner of salutation this
should be. And the angel said unto her, Fear not, Mary, for thou
hast found favor with God and, behold, thou shalt conceive in thy
womb and bring forth a child, and He shall be great and shalt be
called a Son of the Highest. 5. And the Lord God shall give unto
him the throne of his father David: and he shall reign over the
house of Jacob forever; and of his kingdom there shall be no end.
6. Then said Mary unto the angel, How shall this be, seeing I know
not a man? And the angel answered and said unto her The Holy Spirit
shall come upon Joseph thy Spouse, and the power of the Highest
shall overshadow thee, O Mary, therefore also that holy thing which
shall be born of thee shall be called the Christ, the Child of
God, and his Name on earth shalt be called Jesu-Maria, for he shall
save the people from their sins, whosoever shall repent and obey
his Law. 7. Therefore ye shall eat no flesh, nor drink strong drink,
for the child shall be consecrated unto God from its mother's womb,
and neither flesh nor strong drink shall he take, nor shall razor
touch his head.
8. And, behold, thy cousin Elisabeth, she hath also conceived
a son in her old age: and this is the sixth month with her, who
was called barren. For with God no thing shall be impossible. And
Mary said, Behold the handmaid of the Lord; be it unto me according
to thy word. And the angel departed from her. 9. And in the same
day the angel Gabriel appeared unto Joseph in a dream and said
unto him, Hail, Joseph, thou that art highly favored, for the Fatherhood
of God is with thee. Blessed art thou among men and blessed be
the fruit of thy loins. 10. And as Joseph thought upon these words
he was troubled, and the angel of the Lord said unto him, Fear
not, Joseph, thou Son of David, for thou hast found favor with
God, and behold thou shalt beget a child, and thou shalt call his
name Jesu-Maria for he shall save his people from their sins. 11.
Now all this was done that it might be fulfilled which was written
in the prophets saying, Behold a Maiden shall conceive and be with
child and shall bring forth a son, and shall call his name Emmanuel,
which being interpreted is, God Within Us. 12. Then Joseph being
raised from sleep did as the angel had bidden him, and went in
unto Mary, his espoused bride, and she conceived in her womb the
Holy One.
1 John 4:2
By this you know the Spirit of God: Every spirit that confesses
that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is of God,
1 John 4:3
and every spirit that does not confess that Jesus Christ has
come in the flesh is not of God. And this is the spirit of the
Antichrist, which you have heard was coming, and is now already
in the world.
2 John 1:7 ( Beware of Antichrist Deceivers ] For many deceivers
have gone out into the world who do not confess Jesus Christ as
coming in the flesh. This is a deceiver and an antichrist.
Isaiah 7:14 KJV
Therefore the Lord Himself will give you a sign: Behold, the
virgin shall conceive and bear a Son, and shall call His name Immanuel.
The original Hebrew text of Isaiah 7:14 reads as follows (translated):
"Therefore the Lord Himself shall give you a sign: behold,
the young woman [ha-almah] shall conceive, and bear a son, and
shall call his name Immanu-el".
For a witness that no man can argue against regarding the validity
of the content of the conception testimony you have just read see
page 24 in the first PDF at the following link.
Todd M. Vetter
http://www.thedeathandresurection.com |
Where is the bit that tells me why you made a prophesy
that turned out to be wrong?
Where did you get the idea that Pope Benedict would die in April 2009
from and why was this wrong? It is a simple request that does not require
all that nonsense posting lifted from the fabrications of the nineteenth
century vegetarian nutter Gideon Ouseley. Yes, I have been debating Christian
nutters for nearly a decade now I am familiar with their spraint, spoor
and ordure.
Why do all those people using Isaiah 7:14 as a prophesy always home
in on the young woman / virgin bit and totally ignore the rather obvious
point that this refers to a child who is to be named (not known as, named)
Immanuel, not a child named after Joshua? Also this child who has already
been conceived at the time of Isaiah's pronouncement (the present tense
is used) is to be a sign validating another prophesy that has absolutely
nothing to do with any anointed one but refers to the foreign policy
stance of King Ahaz in regards to Assyria. It is not a messianic prophesy
and it is not a virgin birth.
I want to know why your prophesy failed, why you thought you were qualified
to make it and why you are now qualified to be taken notice of at all.
Any prophet is only as good as his last prophesy, yours failed. You failed.
You are a failure. There's nothing more useless than a failed prophet.
--
Martin Willett
http://mwillett.org/
I would not mistake my ignorance as a man for the reality of
what was just sent to you.
one of these is from your bible and one is not. If Matt 4:4 is
important then we all have a job to do. that is to figure out which
of these words Jesus really spoke
John 20:21-23
21 So Jesus said to them again, “Peace to you! As the Father
has sent Me, I also send you.” 22 And when He had said this,
He breathed on them, and said to them, “Receive the Holy
Spirit. 23 If you forgive the sins of any, they are forgiven them;
if you retain the sins of any, they are retained.”
Lection LXXXVII
6. Then saith Jesus unto them again, Peace be unto you, as Abba
Amma hath sent me, even so send I you. And when he had said this
he breathed on them and said unto them, Receive ye the Holy Ghost;
preach the Gospel, and announce ye unto all nations; the resurrection
of the Son of Man.
7. Teach ye the holy law of love which I have delivered unto
you. And whosoever forsake their sins, they are remitted unto them,
and whosoever continue in their sins they are retained unto them.
8. Baptize them who believe and repent, bless and anoint them,
and offer ye the pure Oblation of the fruits of the earth, which
I have appointed unto you for a Memorial of me.
If we are baring false witness against christ even in our ignorance,
This is why the Holy spirit is missing from Christianity and has
been missing for some time. Spiritual famine is covered in Bible
prophecy.. most just believe it ended when protastants got the
bible back from Rome.. all they really got was Roman doctrine which
was half the truth..
God bless my judgemental friend.
Todd M. Vetter
http://www.thedeathandresurection.com |
Do you understand the function of a question mark? It's
to mark a question, and you have ignored my questions.
You have not told me which book, scripture, non-canonical gospel or
orifice you pulled your failed prophesy out of.
on 8th February you confidently, if not to say haughtily, predicted
an event which has not come to pass.
Pope Benedict will die in april on the full moon
making way for the Anti-christ. There will be little time after for
you to find God
I'll keep you in my prayers.
Not unsurprisingly your prediction fell flat on its face. Why? It is
a simple question. Where did that prediction come from and why was it
in error?
Why have you been taken in by that utter charlatan Ouseley? Have you
absolutely no critical faculties at all?
Take a look at this, and learn about the provenance of the crap you
have been spouting. A vegetarian teetotaler claims to find a mysterious "lost" gospel
in Tibet in which, shock, Jesus is shown to be a vegetarian abstainer
from alcohol! What do you know? I know bullshit when I step in it. Ouseley
maintained that the contents of the Gospel of the Holy Twelve was channelled
to him by angels, which is so reminiscent of the arch-charlatan
Joseph Smith Jr that I wonder if I even need to point it out. On the other hand
you do seem to be immensely credulous so perhaps I do need to help you
to grasp the concept that gospels and holy books can be the work of pious
forgers and charlatans.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Essenes
It is not too late to reject the false gospel of that nineteenth century
charlatan and retain some faint vestiges of self respect.
--
Martin Willett
http://mwillett.org/
Illustrate fulfilment of Exodus 12... Why does the bible misrepresent
this fulfillment?
Why does the G-12 text give clarity for the resurrection where
the 4 gospels can't seem to get their story straight?
Have you ever read G-12? or did you fall prey to what your itchy
ears wanted to hear by following the croud instead of testing
all things and keeping that which is good?
Todd M. Vetter
http://www.thedeathandresurection.com |
Answer one of my questions and I'll consider answering
two of yours. Deal?
--
Martin Willett
http://mwillett.org/
The failed prophecy came from building on the bible only. The
bible is just a book of Half truth leading men to confusion. It's
not God (God is the word) the bible just a history book containing
some of the words spoken by God and also containing what Satan
has sown in the night. Hence my confusion for believing I could
predict the future with out God speaking directly to me. I use
to believe this was done through the book.. Now I know it's done
through the spirit. That spirit has to be in each of us...And it's
missing from each of us due to baring false witness against Christ
and what he accomplished. We cannot claim to know him if we know
nothing of what he accomplished and the bible misrepresents it
as well. The prediciton came from the bible in correlation with
history as it unfolds.. it was in Error due to building on half
the truth. The bible is Half the truth.
The first PDF at the posted link below illustrates very clearly
why that is.. all the prophecies in the bible to support what
is displayed are present as well. If you prejudge G-12 with out
reading it, you will never see the error in the 4 half truth gospels
in your bible which give you the perception of a profitable truth
by combining the 4, but they still leave you and the rest of
the Christian world confused. Hence why denominational division
exists today.
To predict future events and call it truth is Crap unless God
speaks directly too you and gives you what to say in your ear...
I know that now due to testimony in G-12 which is missing from
the bible. Instead of judging my flaws. carefully review the
first PDF and answer me just one Question. Why does the bible
misrepresent the fulfillment of Exodus 12 which leads to a further
misrepresentiation of the sign of Jonah? See PDF one... The information
could not be displayed more objectively or clearly... a 3rd grader
could understand it.
Todd M. Vetter
http://www.thedeathandresurection.com |
In your reply you state that the G-12 text is a 19th century
forgery. Did the man who translated G-12 also write the gospel
of Thomas which was validated to have been written in the first
century and was not discovered until 1945/ 20th century?
The reason I ask is this. Gospel of Thomas and G-12 are the only
two historical works which contain this testimony from Christ.
If he was a 19th century charlatain as was your words, How do you
explain that time and history confirm the content to be ancient
in origen?
Gospel of Thomas
(28) Jesus said: I stood in the midst of the world, and I appeared
to them in flesh. I found them all drunk, I found none among
them thirsting; and my soul was afflicted for the sons of men,
for they are blind in their heart and they do not see. For
empty came they into the world, seeking also to depart empty
from the world. But now they are drunk. When they have thrown
off their wine, then will they repent.
Lection LXXXVIII verse 5 Gospel of holy 12
http://reluctant-messenger.com/essene/gospel_intro.htm
5. And Jesus said, I stood in the midst of the world, and in
the flesh was I seen and heard, and I found all men glutted with
their own pleasures, and drunk with their own follies, and none
found I hungry or athirst for the wisdom which is of God. My
soul grieveth over the sons and daughters of men because they
are blind in their heart, and in their soul are they deaf and
hear not my voice.
Todd M. Vetter
http://www.thedeathandresurection.com |
Very interesting. Where is it? Where is this priceless
document? We know exactly where the other ancient books and fragments
of writing are so we can verify their age. Not so for the source material
for Ouseley's work. Why is this the case? How did an ancient book get
from Tibet into the hands of a man who already believed in its content?
Ouseley was known as a religious writer and campaigner not as an archaeologist.
Explorers explore, diggers dig but writers write, and religious fantasists
have religious fantasies.
What you have quoted is the third logion from the Oxyrhynchus
Logia.
These two genuine ancient documents now in the British Library, brief
fragments, give examples of agrapha, reported speech of Jesus which does
not appear in the canonical gospels. It does appear in one of these documents.
It also appears in the Gospel of Thomas. Perhaps it appears in another
form also which we are not aware of at this time which Ouseley came across
or had a copy of sent to him. The idea that a huge gospel-sized document
could be unearthed and a man translate it and conveniently lose the original
is absurd. That might have happened in the fifth century, but not the
nineteenth. If the story was true there would be a chain of witnesses,
most of them literate, which could link the finished translation with
the original discovery.
By far the more likely explanation is pious forgery, there are plenty
of precedents for this. The work shows clear evidence of being modelled
on the canonical gospels but with entirely new themes introduced, notably
concern for animal welfare, vegetarianism and a much more enlightened
and far more modern attitude to the status of women and the female. Why
would a genuine scholar allow his work to be dismissed as this work was
dismissed? Your explanation doesn't make any sense. If the material was
genuine and he knew it was genuine he would surely have invited scrutiny
by museums and scholars. Don't any of your alarm bells ring when you
notice how convenient the text is for Ouseley? Nothing in his "found" text
tells a story he would be uncomfortable with. The man was a Christian,
a vegetarian and a man who did not drink out of religious conviction.
Don't you think it is a little convenient that this old book remains
unknown for more than fifteen centuries while Christians drank alcohol
without a care and then suddenly within a few decades of the birth of
a temperance movement this work comes to light and miraculously finds
its way into the hands of one of a minority of vegetarian Christian abstainers?
Ouseley's god wanted him to be a vegetarian for exactly the same reason
why Muhammad's god wanted him to fuck a nine year old child and Joseph
Smith Jr's god wanted him to marry fourteen year old girls and glove
puppets want their "friends" to drink whisky.
Do you have an original copy of the Gospel of the Holy Twelve with a
verified publication date? If not why should we assume that the material
you say is in that book was there before the discovery of Oxyrhynchus
840 in 1905 (or was it 1897?) or the Gospel of Thomas in 1945? The Gospel
of the Holy Twelve was added to several times by Ouseley himself, who
is to say that his apologists have not taken the liberty of adding in
more supporting material later to make it look better because they knew
that this was the way it was written in the first place?
When something looks too good to be true it is prudent to at least suspect
that it might not be true.
--
Martin Willett
http://mwillett.org/
The study that I sent to you proves this with out a shadow of
a doubt if you would take the time to view it instead of debating
with me. Debate facts not speculations. Why does the bible misrepresent
the fulfilment of Exodus 12? Why was Jesus not chosen by the people
on the 10th day of the first month per the exodus 12 prophecy?
Why does Gospel of Holy 12 illustrate that Christ did fulfill this
prophecy?
God Bless
Todd M. Vetter
http://www.thedeathandresurection.com |
All the gospels were written after the prophesies, that is a fact. It
is simply incompetence that allows Jesus not to fulfil
passages regarded as prophesies. The gospel writers tried to write the
story so that as many prophesies as possible were fulfilled, of course
the key prophesies could not be fulfilled because that would require
a Jewish king (a human, not a god or a son of a god) to conquer the world,
bring peace and rebuild the temple. Jesus failed to do the most important
things the Messiah had to do. Ouseley managed to write in one fulfilled
prophesy that the other earlier forgers missed, so what? There is no
evidence that any of the gospel events happened and any halfway impartial
observer can see that large parts of the gospels are obviously made up
for the simple reason that they look so transparently like attempts to
show prophesies being fulfilled. Some of the gospel writers even go and
blow their own cover by declaring that a particular detail of the story "happened" in
order for the prophesy to be fulfilled. Ouseley's attempt is no different
except that he had access to all the canonical gospels plus other material
and he knew where the existing gospels were lacking because he had access
to critiques from free thinkers and Jews. It would be more convincing
if it contradicted the canonical gospels more in weird and uncomfortable
ways, especially if they were uncomfortable for a nineteenth century
Catholic vegetarian abstainer. Can you see any details which would cause
Ouseley personal embarrassment? The Gospel of Thomas and other non-canonical
gospels are full of weird and embarrassing stuff, the fact that the Gospel
of the Holy Twelve is so twee and devoid of inexplicable weirdness (apart
from animal rights, vegetarianism, feminism and deprecation of alcohol)
suggests strongly that it is a forgery, and the forger even signed his
name to it.
What you see as evidence that the gospel is genuine I see as evidence
that it is a forgery. There is nothing in the words Ouseley published
which contradicts his personal religious message, nothing which doesn't
seem to make any sense at all. Any nineteenth century Christian would
like the opportunity to write Jesus objecting to primitive and barbaric
animal sacrifices in the temple, even those who ate meat. Many would
also like to give women a better role and play down the superstitious
nonsense about the virgin birth. Many would also like to make Jesus a
more rounded and well-educated man, a seasoned traveller, less of a country
bumpkin with no learning except for Jewish law and scriptures, basically
less of a Jew and more of a Christian gentleman.
Anybody with a brain who is familiar with the gospels can appreciate
that the nativity story is made up, and done in such a way as to appear
to fulfil prophesies and at the same time include the son-of-a-god-born-of-a-virgin
theme that was so popular in cults around the Mediterranean for the previous
couple of centuries. It is clear that Jesus was known to be from Galilee,
he had a thick yokel Galilee accent so he couldn't hide that fact and
people were concerned that he was apparently claiming to be the Messiah
without the city of David and David's line backstory. An explanation
was required so the gospel writers provided one. And a completely contradictory
one too for good measure. Pious forgery is as old as Christianity. The
original four missed one and Ouseley covered it with his own lie. Where's
the mystery in that?
More to the point where are the original documents? We're still waiting
more than a century later. Hello?
--
Martin Willett
http://mwillett.org/
You are a critic on a gospel you have never read in full or
your statements would not reflect such ignorance regarding the
text.. You have fallen for that which your itchy ears wanted to
hear and have chosen your God (a book) and defend the book with
great speculations...Hope the book speaks for you on judgment day..
My God Is living and consistent... yours is a collection of papers
that can't get the story straight because so much was taken out.
You believe G-12 only illustrates one prophecy fulfillment more
than the bible? there are at least 20+ prophecies contained in
G-12 text that history confirms to be fulfilled that the bible
is lacking.. The sign of Jonah is just one of those. The forgery
is passing off 4 half truth gospels as a full truth.. causing
men to make a book their God and never giving mankind the full
wisdom needed to resist sin and receive the baptism of Spirit.
hence the spiritual famine that Christ prophesied would come after
he departed.
The bible with traditions of men teaches that Christ came to
forgive our sins, He came to give us the knowlege to have our sins
forgen us. Find one spot in the gospel where Christ forgave sins
or did he say your sins are forgiven you due to a repentant heart?
Did you know that what is recorded in the first book of Matthew
is from the spirit of anti-Christ? You would have to read the
conception testimony in G-12 to even see why i would make this
statement.
G-12 illustrates Christ coming according to the Flesh fulfilling
3 prophecies for this event, The Matthew testimony in Chapt.
one fulfills only one prophecy which had to be twisted by Rome
to fit the text they added to the book of Matthew .
The bible does not illustrate the fulfillment of Psalms 2:7 in
the gospels... it talks about it in the later books.. G-12 illustrates
this prophecy fulfilled where the bible does not... I can list
20+ Prophecies but don't have the time to re-write the solid
re-search that has already been sent to you at the below link which
illustrates all of what I am saying ... in case you lost it see
first PDF at the following link or the attachment
http://www.thedeathandresurection.com
The book assembled by the men of Rome which prophecy said smash
and destroy all things, Your faith is in the men of your forefathers.
Until you hear God's voice in the book and know the words to
be true.. you will never see what Satan has sown in the night
in the same field. You will continue to eat from the tree of
Good and evil which only leads to one place, confusion and death.
God Bless and good luck. Speculation has been removed from the
first document at the link. let me know if any testimony is misrepresented...
Remember if they speak not according to the Law and testimony
there is no light in them. You probably believe the Law and testimony
to be the bible as a whole, they are the words professed from
the mouth of God which are consistent.. let me know if the Laws
of Moses and the testimony of Jesus are misrepresented by the
attachment. In color font below is an illustration of how the
bible misrepresents the Laws and testimony, thus misrepresenting
Christ and causing him to loose credibility, just to give you
an example
If you can find any Error in this study up to page 36... ask
if the error is your traditional perception which may fall under
deception. Everything listed is from Bible scripture, history,
or gospel testimony found in the world where God and Satan have
both sown their Seed.. prophecy is God's witness of his son...
Why does the bible portray that Christ was not God's son? Then
try to portray that he was His son?
The Three verses of Testimony below add to a great deal of speculation
in testimony and cause what could be the greatest doubt as to whether
Christ was the Passover Lamb or not If the Lamb was to be killed
on the 14th day and the feast of unleavened bread was not until
evening start of the 15th of Nissan/Abib. These three verses of
testimony not written by a Jew destroy Christ’s credibility
of being the Passover Lamb. Was the Gospel testimony always worded
this way? G-12 speaks very differently and in a way that restores
Christ's credibility.
Luke 22: 7-9
7 Then came the Day of Unleavened Bread, when the Passover must
be killed. 8 And He sent Peter and John, saying, “Go and
prepare the Passover for us, that we may eat.” 9 So they
said to Him, “Where do You want us to prepare?”
Mark 14:12
12 Now on the first day of Unleavened Bread, when they killed
the Passover lamb, His disciples said to Him, “Where do You want
us to go and prepare, that You may eat the Passover?”
Matthew 16: 17-18
17 Now on the first day of the Feast of the Unleavened Bread
the disciples came to Jesus, saying to Him, “Where do You want
us to prepare for You to eat the Passover?” 18 And He said, “Go
into the city to a certain man, and say to him, ‘The Teacher
says, “My time is at hand; I will keep the Passover at your
house with My disciples.”’”
Does G-12 text contain the testimony that clears the confusion
on this issue? See below and decide for yourself. Are the three
verses above bad seed sown in the night by Christ’s enemy
to cause him to loose credibility? You decide!
Lection LXXI :10
10. And Jesus seeing the Passover night was at hand, sent two
of his disciples, that they should prepare the upper room where
he desired to eat with his twelve, and buy such things as were
needful for the feast which he purposed thereafter.
This appears to be the testimony of a Jewish person who knew
the Laws of Moses. What follows below is extremely important to
determine which is really what Christ spoke or not since this is
the charge of Christ to the Apostles. Are we fulfilling the mission
he spoke to us?
John 20:21-23
21 So Jesus said to them again, “Peace to you! As the Father
has sent Me, I also send you.” 22 And when He had said this,
He breathed on them, and said to them, “Receive the Holy
Spirit. 23 If you forgive the sins of any, they are forgiven them;
if you retain the sins of any, they are retained.”
Lection LXXXVII
6. Then saith Jesus unto them again, Peace be unto you, as Abba
Amma hath sent me, even so send I you. And when he had said this
he breathed on them and said unto them, Receive ye the Holy Ghost;
preach the Gospel, and announce ye unto all nations; the resurrection
of the Son of Man.
7. Teach ye the holy law of love which I have delivered unto
you. And whosoever forsake their sins, they are remitted unto them,
and whosoever continue in their sins they are retained unto them.
8. Baptize them who believe and repent, bless and anoint them,
and offer ye the pure Oblation of the fruits of the earth, which
I have appointed unto you for a Memorial of me.
Until Mankind reads G-12 (gospel of holy 12) in full they will
never understand the importance of re-discovering what Rome threw
away in the 3rd and 4th century at the councils. They will never
understand the false perception of salvation (Spiritual Famine)
and why God would have allowed it for much of the last 1900 years.
Todd M. Vetter
http://www.thedeathandresurection.com |
The more prophesies which appear to be fulfilled the more obvious it
is that the document is a forgery. Can't you see that? It is the absence
of awkward, embarrassing, puzzling or frankly incomprehensible material
which shows that it is the work of a man deliberately making shit up
to fill the pages of a provincial newspaper. Please address this point
otherwise you are just arguing past me and wasting your time.
As for reading the entire thing I'm fed up with such challenges. I read
the whole Bible, cover to cover, after years of such challenges and that
didn't change my view of the thing, it just improved my understanding
of why I was right and gave me a better insight. If somebody says they
don't like beef you don't expect them to refrain from expressing such
a conclusion until they have chewed up and swallowed a whole cow in misery.
I have read enough of it to know what it is and what it isn't. Have you
read the entire Qur'an or Book of Mormon? How about Das
Kapital?
Have you read the book as written by Ouseley or have you merely played
with an online text?
Answer me, don't preach, you're no good at it anyway.
--
Martin Willett
http://mwillett.org/
todd vetter wrote:
You have fallen for that which your itchy ears wanted to hear and
have chosen your God (a book) and defend the book with great speculations...
Your comprehension skills are alarmingly poor Mr Vetter.
Do I have to remind you of a few basic concepts again?
Please bear the following in mind:
1] I don't believe in gods of any kind
2] I don't believe that the Jews are in any way special
3] I don't believe in prophesy or prophets. I don't believe that anybody
can hear messages from gods (see point 1 and point 2). I don't believe
that any gods would operate through the mentally ill or charlatans.
4] I believe all religion is man-made
5] I don't believe the Bible is special (see points 1 to 4)
In the light of your clear demonstration of appallingly bad comprehension
what cause would be served in continuing this debate? Not a cause I want
to pursue.
I have no soft spot for the Bible, I was driven to read the wretched
thing by arseholes like you demanding that I had to read every single
word before I could pronounce on whether it was divinely inspired or
cobbled together by men in the pre-scientific era. I have read every
word and my opinion has not changed, it is still a book cobbled together
by men in the pre-scientific era but now I can say so from direct experience
of reading every word of the turgid tome.
--
Martin Willett
http://mwillett.org/ |