AtheismPoliticsMemesMindMattersStringRandomInteractFeedbackLinksDebateHomeMissionary PositionShould We Tolerate the Religious? |
Successful religion is about stating absurdities in a voice that sounds reasonable and assured, or whatever mood your audience requires. Strip away the voice and the arguments are limp and flaccid. Here is a thought experiment:
Try reading that to yourself in the voice of Richard Burton, Walter Cronkite, James Earl Jones, Lisa Simpson, Jack Kennedy or whichever voice you think has the most gravitas. Then try reading out the same words in the voice of Fozzie Bear, or Richard Nixon, Del Trotter, Woody Allen or Sir Les Patterson and see if it still has the same effect. With a big dress, a spotlight, a microphone and the whole audience looking your way it is easy to sound profound. Say the same thing on a radio talk show and it sounds trite and limp, yell them at people as they walk past in the street and they sound psychotic. Take away the reverence and pay attention to the words. Let them speak for themselves without you willing meaning, gravitas and significance into them. Truth doesn't need a voice coach. Reading any holy book (or political manifesto or philosophy) willing it to make sense to you and to resonate with you is not study, it is self-brainwashing. |
© 1999 - 2008 by Martin Willett. |
mwillett.org: Debate Unlimited |