I am a large voluptuous women, sensuous, beautiful and sexy according to my husband who is absolutely gorgeous and many years younger than me. I was skinny as a young women but feel much more at ease with myself at an english size 22/24. No more diets for me I'm revelling in the fact that most men including my sons in there 20's have decided that women should not be shaped as teenaged boys but soft, curvy, and sexy like their mum. SAll you mums out there should educate their sons. Even my daughter who is a size 16 likes a man with a bit of meat on him.

It is just a holywood and cloud cuckoo land fantasy that we should all be stick thin in order to be loved. I am the most loved womwn in the world and the most fortunate without being the thinnest. I look after myself am educated and kind and loving. what more would a man want.

Give up trying to be stick thin, be yourself and the right man will come along for ypou who will love you for every pound you carry and every piece of chocolate you eat without feling guilty. Don't just dream, live the dream, I am.

Jackie

i wanted the epitome of amazon sexuality in jpg. what i got was a big fat renee zelwigger. who do u who do u...donkeysnort

Hello, I hope you take the time to read this, because I have a need to communicate with other athiests. After reading about your growing up years, I find that I have had similar experiences. My first questioning about a god, was when I was about 6 years old, when all of a sudden it occured to me that when I die, I would be dead forever. I did not dwell on that idea, but it remained at the back of my mind. As the years went by, things I learned and observed just substantiated my idea that there was no god. I have always been very interested in science, and I have observed subtle changes in behaviors. I have observed that certain behaviors would allow a species to reproduce, and others would hinder reproduction. So Darwin may not have been completely accurate, but he had the right ideas. The behaviors of a species have to fit with the environemntal situation that exists. Evolution does exist. In fact, I feel there is enough information about evolution to take evoultion out of being a theory and say it is a fact. To me, evolution is a FACT, and I know that I evolved.

Religion, or god, is not a fact. God was invented by people to help them explain their fears about the world around them. Just imagine how many thousands of years men worshiped many gods before the "single god theory" developed. There is no proof that there is any god. The main argument is that this complicated universe, with complicated animal and plant species could not have just happened, through evolution. A god would be the only way it could come about. That is rubbish! The only way it could have happened is through evolution, step by step minute changes. . Minute chemical changes that deveolped over billions and millions of years. Most men just can not imagine such lengths of time, where evolutionary processes can mold life, and therefore they connect the physical world with a god. Most men have heard the phrase, "If evoultion could not explain the existance of the universe, then where did this complicated god come from?" For a god to exist, it would have to have evolved too, or it would have had to have, at least a parent, which would have had to evolve, but I think that if a being, complicated enoiugh to create the universe and living species could evolve, then the unverse and living things could have just as well evolved without the middle man, "god"

Sorry, but I digress. I also had a grandfather that had a farm. I spent all my growing up summers there where I could observe nature and become aware of subtle changes. What many people don't realize is that within a species many variences in physical structure, and behavioral attitude exist. The members of a species may all look alike, but they are not exactly alike. Unless one has taken the time to really observe these differences, then they may not be apparent. Some may be genetic or chemical, and not be observable. When an environmental change occurs, there may be certain members of that species that have the genetic potential to addapt to the change, while the others, that don't have the necessary addaptive behaviors, do not reproduce. (Survival of the fittest) I believe that the members of many species having become too much alike, put themselves at risk, when environmental change occurs they are not able to adapt and their species becomes extinct. Many people work hard to stop certain species from becomming extinct, but I feel, that those species have evolved out to the end of a limb, and they don't have enough genetic or physical differences within their species to adapt to the environmental change they find themselves in. The more variety of physical and behavioral differences that exist , within a species, allow it to adapt to environmental change, and therefore extinction is less likely.

Well, I am completely an athiest. I even have come to resent the stupidity of many people that want to follow the dictates of their religion, without opening their minds to other possibilities. They ignore the findings of scientists, and geologists and cling to their religion. One concession I have, is that when I die, I will have known the truth , and all those other people, thinking they are going to heaven or wherever their religion sends them, will die not knowing that they have been hood winked their entire lives.

What about heaven? What would be in heaven? The physical body we know will remain here on earth. If "the soul" would exist, it would probably be some flimsy, or misty like thing. It would have no body, no mouth. There would be no need to eat, because there would be no body to nourish. There would be no sex, because the sexual structures are part of the physical body that died and is burried in the earth. Now, "Heaven" would be like hell. Here you would remain for eternity, no body, no eating, no sex, and nothing to do. There would be no trees, or hills, or flowers, nor rivers and lakes or oceans, because these are all physical structures of the Earth. One would spend eternity doing nothing, in a place with no physical structures. . You would also not be finding your long lost mother, or father, or loved one, in heaven, because with no physical bodies, you would not even recognize anyone. The physical body we would recognize would be burried in the earth. Also, understanding the ever changing and evolving universe, where would heaven be?

Oh yes, one last thing, there were some comments, to you, about if you were actually an athiest, you would not have gotten married in a church, had your children baptized etc. etc. That is because those people don't understand. I encouraged my children to go to church. I went to church, when I was growing up, until I finally realized that it was all false. I was married in a church. I feel that it was my responsibility to allow my children to get an understanding of religion, since most of the people they would encounter in their lives, would probably be religious. . Because I was an athiest did no mean that they would want to be the same. One of my sons is religious, and the other is an athiest. I never ever said anything against the church, while they were growing up. I did teach them about science and offer the ability to become aware of the world around them, That is all! I have to say that I also never built up anything about religion, and never discussed it, because I would be untruthful if I talked about a god that I knew did not exists. When my youngest son was about 18, and had come home from his first year of college, where he had studied comparative religions, he asked me directly if I believed in God. I told him I did not, and he said that he sort of thought that. He is the athiest, like myself, and also my wife, and he came to his conclusions by hemself.

Thank you, I hope you lasted to the end.

Bob H.

You're absolutely right. About everything. I especially love that jibe about the masturbatory fantasies of survivalists: you are dead on.

Some Americans just get too worked up about guns, as if that rifle is a magic wand that'll make everything okay again. A rifle is clearly too little. It is, as you say, a lethal security blanket. Good ol' Chairman Mao would probably revise his statement that "All political power comes from the barrel of the gun" had he owned a nice Soviet SS-25 "Sickle". He'd have never even bothered to write a little Red Book, instead, he'd just have the Western nations glowing a nice bright 'beta emission green' right now.

These days, the neglected children of the international neighborhood seem to want nuclear weapons. They're jealous of America, Russia, China, the UK, and France. Well, maybe they're not jealous of France. If North Koreans can have nuclear weapons, I am very irritated that as a tax paying American, I cannot own my own nuclear artillery. Admittedly, North Korea is a bizarre nation where food is illegal but guns are everywhere, but that's not an excuse. I wish the government would make food illegal in the US, and give me nuclear weapons instead, just to bring us up to that fine standard of living.

America's stance on the legality classification of Class III destructive devices is far too draconian to make those 'masturbatory fantasies' of revolution a reality. A limit to a barrel circumference of 12.5mm (.50 caliber) is far too small for any firearm that'd be of actual use in the 'Burning Times'. I'd require at least a 155mm artillery piece to propel a nuclear warhead a fairly safe distance away.

Gun ownership is a non-issue in the US. It is a pawn of the two party system faux-democracy that's brought up anytime liberals or conservatives want to motivate the people of our country with fear. Either fear of their neighbors (conservatives), or fear of their neighbors (liberals). Many people, myself included, can successfully own guns without raising a huge stink about the Zionist Occupational Government, or ZOG for short. There are Internet morons who will argue incessantly about how you choose to live your life in Britain, and how modern Britain is essentially equivalent to Clockwork Orange (the movie, not the book, since I can't read), because you do not have AR-15 rifles to stop those football hooligans. I am very sorry that they've managed to find your site. I wish I could sacrifice them, similar to how the Aztecs would sacrifice a man to keep the sun coming up every day. Except, instead of keeping the sun coming up, I'd rather keep David Bowie away. That would solve many problems.

Thank you for writing on the Internet, it entertains me.